'We have not found them to be in violation, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or the provision of humanitarian assistance,' the State Department said
Israel was obliged to provide written assurances by Sunday, via a "credible high level official who has the ability and authority to make decisions and commitments about the issues at the heart of the assurances," State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said.
"These assurances are prospective, but of course our view of them is informed by our ongoing assessments of Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza," Miller continued.
"We've had ongoing assessments of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law. We have not found them to be in violation, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or the provision of humanitarian assistance. We view those assurances through that ongoing work we have done," he added.
Dozens of Congressional Democrats, as well as leading international NGOs, have warned that Israel is not in compliance with the memorandum. Leading State Department and USAID officials similarly insisted that Israel's assurances — as well as U.S. Ambassador to Israel Jack Lew's endorsement — failed to account for realities on the ground.
"When it comes to finding a violation of international humanitarian law, that requires a fact-intensive analysis of relevant factors related to international humanitarian law," Miller noted.
"We have ongoing processes to look at those things, and those were processes that started before this memorandum was signed by the president," he said. "But as of yet, we have not made a conclusion that Israel is in violation of international humanitarian law."
Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who was perhaps the leading advocate in Congress pushing for such accountability measures, is seeking clarification from the State Department on the findings. An official familiar says Van Hollen's office was informed earlier Monday that a final decision had not been made and the process was ongoing, and that the Israeli assurances were "credible and reliable" — despite the warnings from 17 Senate Democrats to the contrary.
The Biden administration issued the national security memorandum in February.
The memo marks a number of firsts — including the mandated credible and written assurances from countries prior to weapons transfers, as well as assurances that they won't deny or restrict aid efforts in conflict areas where U.S.-purchased weapons are being used, to guarantee they will not violate human rights with weapons purchased from the U.S.
It further requires the State Department and the Defense Department to send a report to Congress within 90 days of the use of U.S. weapons in armed conflict areas since January 2023.
The memo further creates an enforcement mechanism for holding accountable countries that violate U.S., international or humanitarian law – or used in manners inconsistent with mitigating civilian harm.
It does not apply to air defense systems or any strictly defensive or non-lethal defense articles.
Bernie Sanders, the senior United States senator from Vermont, said that "the State Department's position makes a mockery of U.S. law."
In a statement, Sanders said that "32,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed and almost 75,000 injured, two-thirds of whom are women and children. Some 60 percent of the housing units have been damaged or destroyed, and almost all medical facilities have been made inoperable. Today, hundreds of thousands of Palestinian children are facing starvation because Netanyahu won't let in sufficient humanitarian aid, while thousands of trucks are waiting to get into Gaza. To pretend that Israel is not violating international law or interfering with U.S. humanitarian aid is absurd on its face. The State Department's position makes a mockery of U.S. law and assurances provided to Congress."
Start a new thread, email: peacelist@nwopc.org
This mailing list is an attempt to replace the nwopc yahoo group mailing list. This is a discussion list to share thoughts, ideas and articles that might serve to promote peace in our communities and to end the cultures of war.
NWOPC or any person working on this mail list will not share any data with anyone. We respect your privacy and take it very serious.
Monitoring of any participation or attempted participation in the Peace List by any governmental authority for any purpose whatsoever is strictly forbidden and will result in immediate exclusion and possible referral for prosecution or civil lawsuit.
Other list policies may be found by clicking here.